No medical topic causes as much controversy on the internet as vaccination. Especially after COVID-19. One of the main arguments of the anti-vaccination camp goes something like this: “If my vaccine works, why should you care if I didn’t get it?” The logic is simple: if you’re protected, what does it matter if your neighbor is vaccinated? And if the vaccine stops working around someone who isn’t vaccinated, maybe it doesn’t work?
These questions are part of a larger anti-vaccine puzzle, where science, suspicion, and conspiracy theories are mixed in one boiling pot. Let’s take a look at where these arguments come from and how they turn into memes with confused emojis and comparisons to blood pressure medication.
“Imagine if Medications Stopped Working for Other People”
A comparison is actively circulating in anti-vaccination communities: “Imagine if medications for high blood pressure or diabetes stopped working if someone nearby wasn’t taking them too. Sounds absurd, doesn’t it?” It does sound like a scenario from a science fiction movie. However, there is a key difference: vaccines are not the same as blood pressure medication.
Medications treat symptoms in a specific person. Vaccines, on the other hand, are preventive measures that also work on public immunity. The effect of a vaccine extends beyond individual protection to slowing the spread of the virus. The more people are protected, the less chance the virus will jump from one person to another. And the less chance it has to mutate.
But let’s leave this scientific nuance aside. The idea that “vaccines are useless in the presence of unvaccinated people” seems particularly appealing to those who are already opposed to vaccination. Especially if it is presented caricatured: “Look, your protection has broken down because Vasya is on the subway without Pfizer.”
Free Chemotherapy for Everyone!
The next stop for anti-vaccine rhetoric is a comparison with chemotherapy. “Let’s all get chemotherapy to prevent cancer!” commentators on Telegram channels exclaim. “Where are your statin prescriptions, if we are required to carry vaccination certificates?”
At first glance, this sounds like social satire. But in essence, it is a substitution of concepts. Cancer is not an infectious disease. You cannot “catch” it from your neighbor on the bus. COVID and the flu can be. That is the difference.
However, the comparison with chemotherapy works well as a tactic: It is absurd, provocative, and emotional, and that’s what makes it so appealing.
Pandemic as a Boiling Point
Doubts about vaccinations existed long before COVID-19, but the pandemic catalyzed them. Constantly changing recommendations, new strains, and unclear booster schedules created a sense of chaos. Even people who generally trust science began to get confused by the information.
Against this backdrop, anti-vaxxers offered a simple worldview: “The authorities are confused, which means they are hiding something.” Mix this with distrust of pharmaceutical corporations, add a pinch of personal freedom, and you get a storm on social media.
“Health passes” and restrictions for the unvaccinated were particularly irritating. They were presented as the beginning of a “medical dictatorship,” and vaccines as a political weapon. The argument went like this: “If I need proof of vaccination to buy coffee, then it’s about control.”
Masks, Zombies, and Conspiracy
Masks are a separate layer of rhetoric. “People in masks look like zombies!” claim the authors of posts, accompanying them with photos of people alone in their cars wearing respirators. Supposedly, these “zombies” are so brainwashed that they believe even the air in their own homes is dangerous.
The important thing here is not whether the person wearing a mask in the car is right. What is essential is that the image itself is used as proof of “mass insanity” allegedly caused by vaccines, the media, and a global conspiracy.
Anti-vaccine communities often accompany such arguments with references to mortality rates after vaccination. The problem is that most such “evidence” is distorted or taken out of context. But in Telegram feeds and YouTube videos, it looks convincing, especially when accompanied by the words “URGENT!!! Banned video.”
It Sounds Scary, So It Must Work
Anti-vaxxers often use a set of “scary” terms that easily fit into headlines and comments:
- Nanoparticles allegedly penetrate the brain and cause long-term changes;
- The spike protein is described as a poison circulating in the blood.
- Gene therapy suggests the idea of rewriting DNA;
- The mRNA platform is perceived as an experiment with no consequences.
- Implantable chips are allegedly embedded along with the vaccine.
Such vocabulary plays on emotions and works well in an environment where arguments give way to alarming headlines.
Idea of Herd Immunity
The classic scientific term “herd immunity” has become a point of contention. Normally, it means that the more people are protected, the less chance the virus has of spreading. But in the popular imagination, it has become something of a contract: “If I get vaccinated, you have to, too.”
This is where the logical question from anti-vaxxers arises: “Why do you need my vaccination if you’re already protected?” The answer lies in the nuances: vaccination reduces the risk of severe disease but does not always prevent transmission of the virus. With insufficient coverage, society is at risk of a new wave.
But in Facebook logic, everything is simpler: if someone gets sick, the vaccine is useless. Because it’s supposed to protect, right?
Conspiracies Are More Convenient
Conspiracy is always a shortcut. When science is confused and instructions change every two weeks, it’s easier to believe in “Big Pharma.” According to conspiracy theorists, Big Pharma is making trillions by selling vaccines that “don’t cure anything.” At the same time, it is allegedly leading the digital enslavement of humanity through QR codes, databases, and biometric passports.
Although the reality is a little more complicated (pharmaceutical companies do have huge budgets, but they do not determine the WHO’s global strategies), conspiracy theories provide a convenient framework, especially for those who already distrust the government, the media, and doctors.
Why Understand All This?
You can dismiss anti-vaxxers as fringe figures. But the truth is that such views do not disappear; they transform. Today it is COVID, tomorrow it will be hepatitis, papilloma, influenza, diphtheria. Refusal to vaccinate is turning from a private choice into a threat to public health.
And if we don’t try to understand why these ideas work, it will be difficult to combat them. It’s about mistrust, fear, and the feeling that you are being manipulated.
To understand why anti-vaccine narratives continue to thrive, it is worth examining how they spread:
- Mistrust of authority: Any statement is met with skepticism from politicians to doctors.
- The complexity of science means that people don’t have time or want to understand the terms and logic of research.
- Information overload: thousands of sources say contradictory things.
- Social media: fake news spreads faster than scientific explanations.
- Personal experience: “my neighbor had a bad reaction to the vaccine” is more memorable than statistics.
Without considering these factors, the conversation about vaccination risks turns into a deafening debate.
Science Must Not Give Up
People will always fear what they do not understand, especially concerning their bodies, health, and children. But it is society’s job to explain, argue, and demonstrate.
While some people fear that without vaccination the apocalypse will begin, and others fear that vaccination will lead to chip implantation, there must be someone between them who maintains common sense without a tin foil hat, but also without condescension.
Information hygiene is as much a part of prevention as vaccination. And, oddly enough, it also requires collective immunity.
Comments are closed